🚨COVID mRNA shots may induce cancer in 17 distinct ways based on over 100 studies!
A shocking report written by Mathilde Debord, first published in Lepointcritique.fr claims that mRNA COVID-19 shots may contribute to cancer development in 17 ways- based on over 100 studies.
Key points include:
Genome Instability: Vaccine mRNA may integrate into the host genome, causing mutations that could lead to cancer, as suggested by studies from 2021-2023.
Immune Escape: The spike protein may inhibit tumor suppressor genes (e.g., p53, BRCA1/2), allowing cancer cells to evade immune detection.
DNA Repair Disruption: The spike protein impairs DNA repair mechanisms, increasing cancer risk.
Chronic Inflammation: Lipid nanoparticles in vaccines trigger inflammation, potentially fostering cancer stem cell growth.
Immune Dysregulation: mRNA vaccines suppress T cells and interferon responses, weakening cancer surveillance.
RNA Disruption: Modified mRNA disrupts microRNAs, affecting cell proliferation and tumor suppression.
Oncogenic Pathways: The spike protein activates pathways (e.g., MAPK, PI3K/AKT) linked to tumor growth.
Tumor Microenvironment: Lipid nanoparticles enhance cancer cell spread via the EPR effect, potentially causing “turbo cancer.”
Dormant Cancer Awakening: Vaccine-induced inflammation may reactivate dormant cancers, leading to aggressive relapses.
Immune Monitoring Alteration: Modified mRNA blocks immune receptors, making tumor cells less detectable.
Frameshift Mutations: mRNA translation errors produce aberrant proteins, posing safety risks.
Multiple Injections: Repeated doses may exhaust the immune system, increasing cancer susceptibility.
DNA Contamination: Vaccines contain plasmid DNA, potentially integrating into the genome and raising cancer risk.
SV40 Oncogene Sequences: Pfizer vaccines include SV40 sequences, known to promote cancer in animal studies.
Renin-Angiotensin System Disruption: Spike protein overactivates AT1R, promoting tumor proliferation.
Microbiota Damage: Vaccines reduce bifidobacteria, linked to cancer regulation.
Treatment Resistance: Spike protein may enhance cancer cell survival post-chemotherapy.
Debord importantly states how many in the scientific community warned more than four years ago about the cancer risks associated with COVID mRNA injections. She then proceeds to present evidence from the scientific literature how these shots have the ability to induce, accelerate or “wake up” cancers in 17 different ways.
The English translation of the article can be read below.
Is mass vaccination against COVID in the case of an explosion of cancer cases, as many scientists claim, some of whom had prophesied as early as May 2021? Two years ago, a group of French oncologists published a forum in which they categorically refute this hypothesis: “To date, no alert link has been published between an increased incidence or risk of rapid cancer progression after vaccination-car-COVID-19 or after another vaccination. They now claim to be facing a tsunami of dazzling cancers, especially among young people, to whom they say they find no rational explanation:
We have a staggering increase in pancreatic cancer without any idea of reason. Did something happen? We don't know. The whole world, all the world, is the question. The system that allows us to understand cancer is being misunderstood.
If Professor Khayat is consistent, he cannot theoretically rule out that vaccination can be at the origin of this explosion of cancer cases since it is (1) extremely recent if reference is made to his previous interventions, (2) it affects the whole planet – in particular those who have been forced to inject themselves into a social life or who have aggressively promoted vaccination (the influencers in particular) – and (3) it seems to be responding to an alternative. As would a substance used for the first time in humans, only part of the composition of which is known and whose impact on cancer has not been assessed before its massive deployment.
Epidemiologist Nicolas Huscher last March identified 10 ways in which anti-COVID RNA injections can cause cancer. This list, which was taken from a study [2]published in December 2023 in the journal Cureus, can now be extended to 17 items on the (non-exhaustive) basis of more than 100 studies.
1. Genome instability
The risk of integrating vaccine RNA into the genome of vaccinated individuals was confirmed in 2021 by a series of studies[3],[4],[5]. DNA-induced insertional mutagenesis causes frameshift mutations that induce the production of aberrant proteins leading to cancer.
The European Medicines Agency still claims that the vaccine mRNA cannot penetrate the nucleus of the cells, this integration requiring the use of an enzyme (reverse transcriptase) which, in its view, is absent from human cells. However, this assertion, which is not based on any evidence, was reversed in June 2021. This phenomenon was observed in July 2023 in mice, where a single injection of mRNA led to genetic modification. More recently, vaccine spike protein has been found in tumors of vaccinated patients[7], suggesting that it can be integrated into the genome, the first feared consequence of such integration being the development of cancer.
This hypothesis was revived in mid-April by scientists from a biomolecular research laboratory (Neo7Bioscience) and researchers from the University of North Texas. The molecular data they collected suggest that the RNA derived from the vaccine could be retro-transcriminated in the host genome, permanently altering gene regulation. They also reveal carcinogenic signs and immune collapse.
2. Immune Escape
The Spike protein (S2) inhibits several tumour suppressor genes (p53, BRCA1/2, RB1)[9,[10,[10, 11, , bind to, allowing cancer cells to escape their detection and destruction by the immune system. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher speaks of an "oncogene reversal".
The first study demonstrating this interference of the Spike protein with the p53 protein, also called the “genome guardian”, was published in October 2021 [12]by Jiang et al. The study was retracted in May 2022 by order of the NIH of Anthony Fauci. A request to publish e-mail exchanges concerning this retraction has been made under the Access to Information Act, but the NIH still refuses to communicate the 490 pages of communications. These results were confirmed in vitro by zhang and El Deiry [13]in 2024 and one month later in vivo.
3. 3. Mechanism for repairing altered DNA
The vaccine Spike protein induces genomic alterations and inhibits the DNA repair system (Jiang, zhang and El Deiry). This mechanism normally takes place in the event of an attack by the body, to prevent mutations that may promote the onset of cancer, repair errors affecting oncogenes or tumour-suppressing genes. [15]Its alteration induces immunodeficiency which is “a direct route to cancer”.
The strategic sequence of the Spike protein patented in 2016 by Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel would target a gene (MSH3)[16, which alters a DNA repair deficit[17]. The pathways by which the Spike protein inhibits this mechanism are listed in the article by Baiaran et al.[18, published last April.
4. Chronic inflammation
The lipid nanoparticles [19],[20]used for the transport of vaccine mRNA induce massive secretion of inflammatory proteins[21, 22, 23, 24, (cytokine storm), paving the way for the emergence of cancer stem cells. These cells are likely to grow throughout the organs (including blood stem cells[25) taking into account the generalised biodistribution of the Spike protein[26,[27, the pathogenicity of which is described in detail in three literature reviews[28, 29[30], 30 and more than 320 studies. This inflammation can result in depletion of T cells, which are then no longer able to remove cancer cells.
The Grok AI confirms that the injections are causing acute inflammation, but which would be solved within a few days (Bergamaschi, Ogata) and which would be comparable to that of other vaccines. He said that chronic inflammation required prolonged stimulation, while "programming spike production is limited in time (mRNA is degraded within a few days, Spike within a few weeks), making chronic inflammation unlikely." This claim is contradicted by a series of studies[31], including four recent studies where the Spike protein was found in blood plasma up to 709 days after an injection [32](245 days[33, or 12 months [34]according to other studies), and up to 17 months [35]in the tissues and organs of Japanese patients, especially the brain. More than four years after the first injections, no one actually knows if the body stops producing it.
5. Immune system dysregulation
MRNA vaccination results in suppression of T cells (lymphopénie)[36) and responses to interferon type I[37], which plays a crucial role in the surveillance and proliferation of cancer. These changes lead to impaired innate immunity[38,[39,[40,[41, and reprogramming of the adaptive immune response[42,[43, 43, . Deregulation of the immune system in the central nervous system has also been reported[44].
In the context of COVID-19 vaccination, this inhibition ensures appropriate synthesis of advanced proteins and reduced immune activation. There is evidence that the 100% addition of N1-methyl-pseudourdin (m1-) to mRNA vaccine in a model of mlanome stimulated cancer growth and metastases, while vaccines without mRNA modification were not induced by opposite results, suggesting that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could help the development of the cancer.
Rubio-Casillas et al. Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1'): Friend or foe of cancer? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131427.
Grok cites a 2020 study[45], carried out by Ugur Sahin, CEO of BioNTech, which argues that mRNA vaccines induce robust responses of persistent CD4- and CD8-T cells, detected in the first days post-vaccination, which would contradict the idea of general and long-lasting immunosuppression. On the contrary, Pfizer’s own clinical data demonstrate a decrease in T cells from 6 to 8 days after vaccination in 45% to 46% of the participants, it is known to have worsened over time.
6. RNA disruption
Vaccine mRNA is a modified mRNA for the purpose of increasing its longevity and production. The technique used by Pfizer and Moderna (codon optimization) disrupts microRNAs, which are key players in cell proliferation and death, including cancer cells[47],[48]. A study showed in 2021 [49]that the vaccine Spike protein is transported into microRNA-containing vesicles (exosomes) that will prevent interferon function and thus inhibit natural immunity, disrupting cellular processes such as tumour proliferation or monitoring.
7. Activation of oncogenic pathways
The Spike protein is suspected of indirectly activating several pathways that play a crucial role in tumour growth, proliferation and cell survival (MAPK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR[50,[51, 52), and to increase the level of interleukin 6 (IL-6), a proinflammatory marker involved in immunity, inflammation, tumour growth, progression of metametasures or resistance to immunotherapy. Its chronic elevation is associated with inflammation that can promote cancer in certain settings.
Grok again states that no formal studies link these disturbances to cancer, but a recent study [53]has re-tread metabolic evidence of activation of certain oncogenic pathways, including the PI3K/mTOR pathway in patients who developed leukaemia in weeks following a second or third Pfizer injection.
8. Tumor microenvironment
Lipid nanoparticles (NPLs) accumulate in tissues via the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect, which is characterised by increased permeability of tumour blood vessels and prolonged retention of nanoparticles in tumour tissue. NPLs thus cause a more rapid spread of cancer cells[54][55] , which may explain the phenomenon of “turbo cancer” described by pathologists and oncologists and observed in a study in mice[56]. Is such an acceleration of a pathogenic process valid for other Spike-induced diseases? Swedish researchers demonstrated in 2023 that the Spike protein could not only induce Alzheimer’s disease but reduce the disease incubation time by 80%[57], causing a new form of “turbo Alzheimer’s disease”.
9. Awakening of dormant cancers
Changes in the tumour microenvironment by COVID-19-associated inflammation or vaccination may affect cancer waking up and metastatic relapse.
Patients who had no cancer for many years suddenly relapsed with aggressive and explosive cancers soon after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. These cases show very rapid tumour growth after booster administration. These turbo cancers appear faster and with a more virulence than we expected in patients, even those who had been stable for years. Public health authorities are reluctant to acknowledge this correlation. This phenomenon occurs throughout the world where mRNA vaccines have been administered.
Prof. Ian Brighthope. The big debate: Port Hedland against the Prime Minister. 29 Nov. 2024
The ability of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein to fuse multiple cells[60][61][,[60,[61, explain the cascade of COVID-19 complications, including cancer. The formation of syncytia resulting from this fusion could indeed contribute to the development or progression of cancer, in particular in the case of pre-existing lesions, but also to the formation of metastases and to the cancer recounter, according to former Yale University professor Yuri Lazebni[62].
Precision, ivermectin, whose efficacy against COVID-19 is confirmed to date by more than 100 studies, has many antitumour effects[63) (inhibition of tumour stem cells, proliferation, metastases and angiogenic activity, accelerated programmed death of cancer cells, inversion of multidrug resistance), including its ability to inhibit the formation of syncytia induced by spike[64]. Ivermectin, nobelinated in 2006, has an exceptional level of safety, including in children and pregnant women, making it an essential molecule according to the WHO. Why was it not allowed when the efficacy, safety and carcinogenic potential of mRNA injections were not known? The question should sooner or later be asked.
10. Alteration of immune monitoring
Modified mRNA makes tumour cells “invisible” by blocking activation of the immune system’s first-line receptors (Toll receptors, or TLR).
Karik and Weissman, the two researchers behind Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, explained in 2005 [65]that the synthetic modification of RNA by adding m1 (for which they won the Nobel Prize in Medicine) partially suppressed this shield by blocking the ability of natural RNA to activate primary dentritic cells. One of the functions of these cells is to recognise or “report” pathogens, in particular cancer cells, and to induce a targeted immune response.
These results were confirmed in 2015[66 and 2016[67. The 2016 study also shows that the use of synthetic mRNA does not perform better than natural RNA, while it increases its toxicity (elevated cytokines, neutrophilia), including activating myeloid cells in the blood and spleen, which may reflect a carcinogenic process.
A study of 2021 [68]confirms that Toll-type receptors can act as a double-edged gun and “improve the pathology” that they are supposed to prevent when TLR responses are dysregulated.
11. Frameshift offset
The modified mRNA of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines produces an aberrant immune response when translated. In one third of cases, vaccine mRNA produces an “absurd” or unknown protein, other than the Spike protein for which it is programmed. The study [69]was published in January 2024. The authors agree that if these translation errors are not resolved with the next generation of COVID-19 vaccines, they will pose a major safety issue. They believe, however, that this discovery does not call into question the security of the technology. Another team of researchers [70]made a much more rigorous diagnosis last June of this major mRNA failure:
modified mRNAs are not used clinically because of their durability, potentially permanent and immunostimulant. The persistent nature of mRNA encoding the Spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 leads to dangerously long exposure at an unlimited dose of this pathogenic protein, and therefore needs to be re-evaluated for continuous use in humans.
12. Multiple injections
Repeated exposures to synthetic mRNA and vaccine spike cause the immune system to be exhausted. This immunosuppression, which is probably explained by the opioid of codons and the antibody-dependent facilitation mechanism (ADE),[72,73,73, and is suspected from clinical trials, is marked by a change in antibody class (IgG4)[74,[75,76, and is now heavily documented and supported by a series of studies demonstrating the negative efficacy of the injections. The Peter McCullough Foundation has identified seven to date[77].[78][79][80][81][82][83] This catastrophic change in the immune response, not observed after heterologous vaccination or with DNA vaccines (Irrgang), results in immune tolerance (pathogens cease to be recognised as such) which promotes reinfections [84],[85]and susceptibility to cancer.[87][88][89]
13. DNA contamination of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines
The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contain lfraudulent plasmid DNA[90,[91,[92,[93, 93, form (double circular strand) makes it “deficient for replication”, which means that it can theoretically be integrated into the genome, and thus induce cancer in vaccinated people. We have written many articles on this discovery, confirmed to date by ten teams of researchers [94]around the world, the most recent of which is a molecular geneticist (Dr Soa Pekov)[95) commissioned by the Slovak Government. The amounts reported are dizzying, reaching up to 500 times the ceiling set by the European Medicines Agency, which means that integration into the genome can be done spontaneously, maximising the risk of cancer.
14. Oncogene DNA sequences of SV40 in Pfizer injection
The addition of strategic sequences of SV40, used in genetics to "hacker" the cell nucleus[96], increases the ability of mRNA to be altered in the genome.
Its use, banned by the FDA, was eventually granted by Pfizer, but the company claims that it does not present any health risks. Its carcinogenicity, which has already been extensively documented, was confirmed last October by a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine.. The possibility of it possibly causing cancer is also suggested by a [98]recent study involving vaccinated subjects Pfizer and Moderna, where tumour antigens were found exclusively in the blood of Pfizer vaccinees.
According to Dr McKernan, the originator of this discovery, all Pfizer vaccines (adults, paediatric, monovalent, bivalent) would be affected by this fraud, the origin of which is attributed to the change in [99]production method carried out after the approval of the injections to meet industrial constraints related to the pandemic context. Professor Angus Dalgleish, one of the world’s leading oncologists, recalled in this context that SV40 is the substance that cancer researchers inject mice into cancer to induce cancer when they want to test chemotherapy. Could Pfizer, which now has a quasi-monopoly position in the anticancer treatment market, ignore it? No, and it has not changed its formula despite the collapse of vaccine demand.
15. Deregulation of the renin-angiotensin system (SRA)
The vaccine spike protein causes the overactivation of a key receptor (AT1R) of the renin-angiotensin system, which controls, in particular, the multiplication of cells. This overactivation promotes vascularization, and therefore the proliferation of tumors, and generates an oxidizing stress that is harmful to the cells. Dr Jean-Marc Sabatier (100) warned as early as March 2020 about the consequences of this physiological disorder, which caused an imbalance between the innate and acquired immune response, and which he had prophesied that he might induce many cancers.
16. Destruction of the microbiota
MRNA “vaccines” destroy bifidobacteria present in the microbiota (intestinal flora), which plays a key role in cancer regulation and responses to anticancer therapies. A groundbreaking study published by Dr Sabine Hazan [101]showed in 2022 that COVID mRNA vaccination decimates bifidobacteria present in the gut microbiota, where this loss was observed in patients with invasive cancer. The deleterious impact of injections on the microbiota seems to be confirmed today by the discovery of Spike protein in a colon tumour biopsy in a Pfizer vaccine patient.
17. Increased resistance to treatment
The viral and potentially vaccine-specific Spike protein prolongs the survival of cancer cells after exposure to chemotherapy. This result was demonstrated in 2024 by S. zhang and WS El-Deiry. Although the evidence is limited to the viral Spike protein, the authors believe that this disruption of the immune response, which is closely correlated with the inhibition of the p53 gene and the alteration of the response to DNA damage, can be promoted by repeated injections, given as boosters, and by astronomical amounts of Spike protein produced.
One could add to this catastrophic picture [102]the probable presence of hidden genes in the injections, whose impact they could not predict on health. Unfortunately, there is no evidence of the safety of injections, as their carcinogenicity has not been evaluated in any trial, and no study is known to our knowledge that injections cannot induce, wake up or accelerate cancer.
A large-scale clinical trial launched in 2021 in Australia intended to answer this question. It was abruptly interrupted without explanation by the Australian authorities, which are preparing to illegally destroy the millions of samples of biological tissue collected for this purpose. In addition, several countries reported the existence of highly toxic Pfizer batches suggesting that the company developed products of three different levels of toxicity. Clusters of cancer cases have recently emerged in several hospitals in the United States and Australia. However, the vaccine given to one of the nurses concerned comes precisely from one of these high-risk batches, which corresponds to the one where the largest amounts of DNA have been found.
Has the current global epidemic, the reality of which no one disputes, been anticipated in order to test the technology on which the industry has massively buzzed despite its catastrophic failure[103], in which it has already invested idle sums of money that are now preventing it from backtracking? This is what the husband of a nurse, who died of cancer, is thinking a few months after getting vaccinated so as not to lose her job, and whose husband complains about premeditated poisoning.
References
(1) Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Bruno R. Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 2023 Feb;171:111015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2023.1115.
[2]Valdes Angues R, Perea Bustos Y. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the multi-hit hypothesis of oncogenesis Cureus. 2023 Dec 17;15(12):e50703. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50703.
[3]Aldén M, Olofsson Falla F, Yang D, Barghouth M, Luan C, Rasmussen M, et al. Intracellular reverse transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in vitro in human liver cell line. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022 Feb 25;44(3):1115-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44030073.
[4]Chandramouly G, zhao J, McDevit S, Rusanov T, Hoang T, Borisonnik N, et al. Polz reverse transcribes RNA and promotes RNA-templated DNA repair. Sci Adv. 2021 Jun 11;7(24):eabf1771. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ab1771.
5. Richards A, Barrasa MI, Hughes SH, Young RA, Jaenisch R. Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can into integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues. PNAS. 2021 May 25;118(21):e2105968118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105968118.
[6]Breda L, Papp TE, Triebwasser MP, Yadegari A, Fedorky MT, Tanaka N, et al. In vivo hematopoietic stem cell modification by mRNA delivery. Science. 2023 Jul 28;381(6656):436-443. https://www.doi.org/10.1126/science.ade6967.
[7]Dr McKernan made this discovery by analysing the biopsy of colon cancer of a person who received four mRNA injections from Pfizer. Japanese MP and former Japanese minister Kazuhiro Haraguchi publicly stated in late May that vaccine Spike protein had also been found in the cancer cells of his malignant lymphoma.
https://x.
com/tatiann69922625/status/1931707697379480010. This discovery was discussed with epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher:
.
[9- Singh N, Singh AB. S2 Subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 interacts with tumor suppressor protein p53 and BRCA: an in silico study. Transl Oncol. 2020 Oct;13(10):100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100814. The results of this study were published on 30 June 2020.
[10]Chen X, zhang T, Su W, Dou, D, D, Jin X, et al. Mutant p53 in cancer: from molecular mechanism to therapeutic modulation. Cell Death Dis. 2022 Nov 18;13(11):974. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05408-1.
[11]According to Valdes Angues et al., “Cancel associated with TP53 mutations include breast cancer, bone and soft tissue sarcomas, brain tumours and adrenal cortical carcinomas. Other less common cancers include leukaemia, stomach cancer and colorectal cancer. Cancers associated with altered BRCA1 activity include breast, uterine and ovarian cancer in women, prostate and breast cancer in men, and a modest increase in pancreatic cancer in men and women. The most frequently reported cancers with BRCA2 mutations include pancreas, prostate in men and melanoma."
[12]Jiang H, Mei YF. SARS-CoV-2 odd spike DNA damage repair and inhibitor v(d)j recombination in vitro. Viruses. 2021;13(10):2056. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13102056. Link to study in French: https://www-mdpi-com.translate.goog/1999-4915/13/10/2056? x-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[13]13-hang S, El-Deiry WS. SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein inhibitors tumor suppressor p53 and creates a vulnerability to cancer. bioRxiv (preprint). 2024 Apr 15. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.12.589252.
14. Shang S, El-Deiry WS. Transfected SARS-CoV-2 spike DNA for mammalian cell expression inhibitors p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells and increases cancer cell viability after chemotherapy exposure. Oncotarget. 2024 May 3;15:275-284. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28582.
[15]Seneff S, Nigh G, Kyriakopoulos AM, McCullough PA. Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNAs vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs. Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Apr 15;164:113008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008.
[16]Ambati BK, Varshney A, Lundstrom K, Pala G, Uhal BD, Uversky VN, et al. MSH3 homology and potential recombination link to SARS-CoV-2 furin cleavage site. Virol Front. 2022 Feb;2:834808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808.
[17]http://genatlas.medecine.univ-paris5.fr/fiche.php? symbol-- SH3
18. Ba'aran N, Szewczyk-Roszczenko O, Roszczenko P, Vassetzky Y, Sjakste N. Genotoxic risks in patients with COVID-19. Infect Genet Evol. 2025 Apr;129:105728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2025.105728.
[19]Kedmi R, Ben-Arie N, Peer D. The systemic toxicity positively charged lipid nanoparticles and the role of Toll-like receptor 4 in immune activation. Biomaterials. 2010 Sep;31(26):6867-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.027.
[20]Turni C, Lefringhausen A. COVID-19 vaccines: An Australian review. J. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2022 Sep 21;7(3):491-508. https://blog.fdik.org/2023-03/covid19-vaccinesan-australian-review.pdf.
[21]Ndeupen S, Qin, Jacobsen S, King A, Estanbouli H, Igy-rt. B. The mRNA-LNP platform’s lipid nanoparticle component used in preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatory. iScience. 2021 Dec 17;24(12):103479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103479.
[22]Alameh MG, Tombzcz I, Bettini E, Lederer K, Sittplangkoon C, Wilmore JR, et al. Lipid nanoparticles enhance the efficacy of mRNA and protein subunit vaccines by inducing robust T follicular helper cell and humoral responses. Immunity. 2021 Dec 14;54(12):2877-2892.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.11.001.
[23]Theoharides TC. Potential association of mast cell activation by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with cancer progression. Med Hypoth. 2022;160:110774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2022.110774.
[24][24--Sagala G. Apparent cytotoxicity and cytotoxicity of lipid nanomaterials contained in a COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine. IJVTPR. 2023 Oct 16;3(1):957-72. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v3i1.84.
[25]Estep BK, Kuhlmann CJ, Osuka S, Suryavanshi GW, Nagaoka-Kamata Y, Samuel CN, et al. Skewed fate and hematopoiesis of CD34 - HSPCs in umbilical cord blood amid the COVID-19 pandemic. iScience. 2022 Dec 22;25(12):105544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105544.
[26]Jahankhani K, Ahangari F, Adcock IM, Mortaz E. Possible cancer-causing capacity of COVID-19: Is SARS-CoV-2 an oncogenic agent? Biochemistry. 2023 May 23;S0300-9084(23)00136-0. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2023.05.014.
[27]Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Nonclinical evaluation report: BNT162b2 [mRNA) COVID-19 vaccinia (COMIRNATY TM). 2021 Jan. p. 45. https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf
[28]Trougakos IP, Terpos E, Alexopoulos H, Politou M, Paraskevis D, et al. COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-induced adverse effects: unwinding the unknowns. Trends Mol Med. 2022 Oct;28(10): 800-802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2022.07.008.
[29]Parry PI, Lefringhausen A, Turni C, Neil CJ, Cosford R, Hudson NJ, Gillespie J. “Spikeopathy”: COVID-19 spike protein is pathogenic, from both virus and vaccination mRNA. Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 17;11(8):2287. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082287.
[30][30-Posa A. Spike protein-related proteinopathies: A focus on the neurological side of spikeopathies. Ann Anat. 2025 Apr 18;260:152662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2025.152662.
[31]Petrosin S, Matende N. Elimination/Neutralization of COVID-19 Vaccine-Produced Spike Protein: Scoping Review. Mathews J Nutr Diet. 2024;7(2):1-23. https://doi.org/10.30654/MJND.10034.
[32]Bhattacharjee B, Lu P, Monteiro VS, Tabachnikova A, Wang K, Hooper WB, et al. Immunological and antigenic signatures associated with chronic illnesses after1 COVID-19 vaccination. MedRxiv (preprint). 2025 Feb 25. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379.
[33]Patterson BK, Yogendra R, Francisco EB, Guevara-Coto J, Long E, Pisa A, et al. Detection of S1 spike protein in CD16 monocytes up to 245 days in SARS-CoV-2-negative post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS) individuals. Hum Vaccine Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2494934. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2494934.
[34]Alghamdi A, Hussain SD, Wani K, Sabico S, Alnaami AM, Amer OE, et al. Altered circulating cytokine profile among mRNA-vaccinated young adults: A year-long follow-up study. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2025 Apr;13(4):e70194. https://doi.org/10.100/iid3.70194.
[35]Ota N, Itani M, Aoki T, Sakurai A, Fujisawa T, Okada Y, et al. Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemorrhagic stroke post-mRNA vaccination. J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jun;136:111223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111223.
[36]Valdes Angues R, Perea Bustos Y. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the multi-hit hypothesis of oncogenesis Cureus. 2023 Dec 17;15(12):e50703. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50703.
[37]Rubio-Casillas A, Cowley D, Raszek M, Uversky VN, Redwan EM. Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1'): Friend or foe of cancer? Int J Biol Macromol. 2024 May;267(Pt 1):131427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131427.
[38]Ivanova EN, Shwetar J, Devlin JC, Buus TB, Gray-Gaillard S, Koide A, et al. mRNA COVID-19 vaccine elicits potent adaptive immune response without the acute inflammation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. iScience. 2023 Nov 24;26(12):108572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108572.
[39]Seneff S, Nigh G, Kyriakopoulos AM, McCullough PA. Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNAs vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs. Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Apr 15;164:113008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008.
[40]Liu J, Wang J, Xu J, Xia H, Wang Y, C, et al. Comprehensive investigations revealed consisting pathophysiological alterations after vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines. Cell Discov. 2021 Oct 26;7(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-021-00329-3.
[41]Ning W, Xu W, Cong X, Fan H, Gilkeson G, Wu X, et al. COVID-19 mRNA vaccinia BNT162b2 inducers autoantibodies against type I interferons in a healthy woman. J Autoimmune. 2022 Oct;132:102896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2022.102896.
[42]Qin, Known A, Herbst C, Igy-rt-- B---------------------------------------------------- Pre-exposure to mRNA-LNP inhibitor adaptive immune responses and alters innate immune fitness in an inheritable fashion. PLoS Pathog. 2022 Sep 2;18(9):e1010830. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1010830.
[43]F. F. F. F., Geckin B., zoodsma M, Kilic G, Liu, R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R. R The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses. Clin Immunol. 2023 Oct;255:109762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2023.109762.
[44]Abramczyk H, Brozek-Pluska B, Beton K. Decoding COVID-19 mRNA vaccine immunometabolism in central nervous system: human brain normal glial and glioma cells by Raman imaging. Biovrix. 2022 Mar 2. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.02.482639.
[45]Sahin U, Muik A, Derhovanessian E, Vogler I, Kranz LM, Vormehr M, et al. COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and T H 1 T cell responses. Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):594-599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2814-7.
[46]Mulligan MJ, Lyke KE, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults. Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):589-593. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2639-4.
[47]Raisch J, Darfeuille-Michaud A, Nguyen HT. Role of microRNAs in the immune system, inflammation and cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 May 28;19(20): 2985-96. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i20.2985.
[48][48--------------------------------------------------------- MicroRNA regulation of T-cell exhaustion in cutaneous T cell lymphoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2022 Mar;142(3 Pt A): 603-612.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2021.08.447.
[49]Mishra R, Banerjea AC. SARS-CoV-2 spike targets USP33-IRF9 axis via exo-positive miR-148a to activate human microglia. Front Immunol. 2021 Apr 14;12:656700. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.656700.
[50]Kyriakopoulos AM, Nigh G, McCullough PA, Seneff S. Mitogen activated protein Kinase (MAPK) activation, p53, and autophagy inhibition characterize severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein induced neurotoxicity. Cureus. 2022 Dec 9;14(12):e32361. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32361.
[51]Barreda D, Santiago C, Rodriguez JR, Rodriguez JF, Casasnovas JM, Mérida I et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its receptor binding domain promote a proinflammatory activation claim on human dendritic cells. Cells. 2021 Nov 23;10(12):3279. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123279.
[52]Chaudhary JK, Yadav R, Chaudhary PK, Maurya A, Roshan R, Azam F, et al. Host cell and SARS-CoV-2-associated molecular structures and factors as potential therapeutic targets. Cells. 2021 Sep 15;10(9):2427. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10092427.
[53]Erdodu B, Kaplan O, Fidan BB, zelebier M, Malkan zY, Haznedaroglu IC. Metabolomic profiling of leukemic hematopoiesis: effects of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccin administration. Curr Mol Med. 2025 Jun 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0115665246361878250601074766.
[54]Omo-Lamai S, Wang Y, Patel MN, Essien EO, Shen M, Majumdar A, et al. Lipid nanoparticle-associated inflammation is triggered by sensing of endosomal damage: Engineering endosomal escape without side effects. BioRxiv (preprint). 2024 Apr 18. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.16.589801.
[55]Ko M, Quizones-Hinojosa A, Rao R. Emerging links between endosomal pH and cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2020 Jun;39(2):519-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-020-09870-1.
[56]Eens S, Van Hecke M, Favere K, Tousseyn T, Guns PJ, Roskams T, Heidbuchel H. B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma following intravenous BNT162b2 mRNA booster in a BALB/c mouse: A case report. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1158124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1158124. See our article: https://lepointcritique.fr/2023/07/19/un-circums-de-dun-turbo-cancer-two-day-after-acknowledge-one-two-dose-de-vaccine-pfizer/.
[57]Larsson J, Hellstrand E, Hammarstrom P, Nystrom S. SARS-CoV-2 Spike amyloid fibrils specifically and selectively accelerates amyloid fibril formation of human prion protein and the amyloid peptide. 2023 Sept 1. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.01.555834.
[58]Francescangeli F, De Angelis ML, Baiocchi M, Rossi R, Biffoni M, zernner A. COVID-19–induced modifications in the tumor microenvironment: Do they affect cancer reawakening and metastatic relapse? Front. Onco l. 2020 Oct 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.592891.
[59]Theuerkauf SA, Michels A, Riechert V, Maier TJ, Flory E, Cichutek K, et al. Quantitative assays reveal cell fusion at minimal levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and fusion from without. iScience. 2021 Feb 9;24(3):102170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102170.
[60]Or X, Liu Y, Lei X, Li P, Mi D, Ren L, et al. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat Commun. 2020 Mar 27;11(1):1620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15562-9.
[61]Nguyen HT, Shang S, Anang S, Wang J, Ding H, et al. Spike glycoprotein and host cell determinants of SARS-CoV-2 entry and cytopathic effects. J Virol. 2021 Feb 10;95(5): e02304-20 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02304-20.
[62]Lazebnik Y. Cell fusion as a link between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, COVID-19 complications, and vaccine side effects. Oncotarget. 2021 Dec 7;12 (25): 2476-2488. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28088.
[63]Tang M, Hu X, Wang Y. Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug. Pharmacol Res. 2021 Jan;163:105207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105207.
[64]Braga L, Ali H, Secco I, Chiavacci E, Neves G, Goldhill D, et al. Drugs that inhibitor TMEM16 proteins block SARS-CoV-2 spike-induced syncytia. Nature. 2021; 594:88-93. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03491-6.
[65]Karik K, Buckstein M, Ni H, Weissman D. Suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA. Immunity. 2005 Aug;23(2):165-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.06.008.
[66]Andries O, McCafferty S, De Smedt SC, Weiss R, Sanders NN, Kitada T. N(1)-methylpsudouridine-incorporated mRNA outperforms pseudouridine-incorporated mRNA by providing enhanced protein expression and decreased immunogenicity in mammalian cell lines and mice. J Control Release. 2015 Nov 10;217:337-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.051.
[67]Kauffman KJ, Mir FF, Jhunjhunwala S, et al. Efficacy and immunogenicity of unmodified and pseudouridine-modified mRNA delivered systemically with lipid nanoparticles in vivo. Biomaterials. 2016 Dec;109:78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.006.
[68]Kayesh MEH, Kohara M, Tsukiyama-Kohara K. An overview of recent insights into the response of TLR to SARS-CoV-2 infection and the potential of tlr agonists as SARS-CoV-2 vaccinia adjuvants. Viruses. 2021 Nov 18;13(11):2302. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112302.
[69]Mulroney TE, P-yry T, Yam-Puc JC, Rust M, Harvey RF, Kalmar L, et al. N 1 -methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes 1 ribosomal frameshifting. Nature. 2024 Jan;625(7993):189-94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06800-3
[70]Boros LG, Kyriakopoulos AM, Brogna C, Piscopo M, McCullough PA, Seneff S. Long-lasting, biochemically modified mRNA, and its frameshifted recombinant spike proteins in human and circulation after COVID-19 vaccination. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2024 Jun;12(3):e1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1218.
[71]Benitez Fuentes JD, Mohamed Mohamed K, de Luna Aguilar A, Jiménez Garcia C, Guevara-Hoyer K, Fernandez-Arquero M, et al. Evidence of exhausted lymphocytes after the third anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose in cancer patients. Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 20;12:975980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975980.
[72]Lacout A, Lesgards JF, Lounnas V, Azalbert X, Perronne C, zizi M. Dealing with COVID-19 vaccine related antibody-dependent enhancement: A mini review. Arch Microbiol Immunol. 2024 Jun;8(2): 233-8. https://www.doi.org/10.26502/ami.936500170.
[73]Igy-rt, Qin. The mRNA-LNP vaccines – the good, the bad and the ugly? Front Immunol. 2024 Feb 8;15:1336906. https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1336906.
[74]Uversky VN, Redwan EM, Makis W, et al. IgG4 Antibodies induced by repeated vaccination may generate immune tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. Vaccines. 2023 May 17;11(5):991. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11050991.
[75]Irrgang P, Gerling J, Kocher K, et al. Class switch towards non-inflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Sci Immunol. 2023 Jan 27;8(79):eade2798. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798.
[76]Selva KJ, Ramanathan P, Haycroft ER, Reynaldi A, Cromer D, Tan CW,Pre immunity existent restricts mucosal antibody recognition of SARS-CoV-2 and Fc profiles during breakthrough infections. JCI Insight. 2023 Sep 22;8(18):e172470. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.172470.
[77]Eythorsson E, Runolfsdottir HL, Ingvarsson RF, Sigurdsson MI, Palsson R. Rate of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection during an omicron wave in Iceland. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2225320. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25320.
[78]Shrestha NK, Shrestha P, Burke PC, Nowacki AS, Terpeluk P, Gordon SM. Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine boosting in previously infected or vaccinated individuals. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 19;75(12):2169-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac327.
[79]Chemaitelly H, Ayoub HH, Tang P, Coyle P, Yassine HM, Al Thani AA, et al. Long-term COVID-19 booster effectiveness by infection history and clinical vulnerability and immune imprinting: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Jul;23(7):816-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00058-0.
[80]Nakatani E, Morioka H, Kikuchi T, Fukushima M. Behavioral and health outcomes of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: A case-control study in Japanese small and medium-sized enterprises. Cureus. 2024 Dec 13;16(12):e75652. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75652.
[81]Feldstein LR, Ruffin J, Wiegand R, Grant L, Babu TM, Briggs-Hagen M, et al. Protection from COVID-19 vaccination and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection among children aged 6 months-4 years, United States, September 2022-April 2023. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2025 Jan 20;14(1):piae121. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piae121.
[82]Ioannou GN, Berry K, Rajeevan N, Li Y, Yan L, Huang Y, et al. Effectiveness of the 2023-to-2024 XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines over long-term follow-up: A target trial emulation. Ann Intern Med. 2025 Mar;178(3):348-359. https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-01015.
[83) Martin Pérez C, Ruiz-Rius S, Ramarez-Morros A, Vidal M, Opi DH, Santamaria P, et al. Post-vaccination IgG4 and IgG2 class switch associates with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections. J Infect. 2025 Apr;90(4):106473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106473.
[84]Shrestha NK, Burke PC, Nowacki AS, Simon JF, Hagen A, Gordon SM. Effectiveness of the coronavirus disease 2019 bivalent vaccinia. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 19;10(6):ofad209. https://doi.org/10.1001/10.1093/ofid/ofad209.
[85]Yamamoto K. Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them. Virol J. 2022 Jun 5;19(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01831-0.
[86]Raszek M, Cowley D , Redwan EM, Uversky VN, Rubio-Casillas A. Exploring the possible link between the spike protein immunoglobulin G4 antibodies and cancer progression. Explor Immunol. 2024;4:267-84. https://doi.org/10.37349/ei.2024.00140.
[87]Cavanna L, Grassi SO, Ruffini L, Michieletti E, Carella E, Palli D, et al. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma developed shortly after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: report of a case and review of the literature. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 12;59(1):157. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010157.
[88]Goldman S, Bron D, Tousseyn T, Vierasu I, Dewispelaere L, Heimann P, et al. Rapid progression of angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine booster shot: a case report. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 25;8:798095. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.798095.
[89]Sekizawa A, Hashimoto K, Kobayashi S, Kozono S, Kobayashi T, Kawamura Y, et al. Rapid progression of marginal area B-cell lymphoma after COVID-19 vaccination (BNT162b2): a case report. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 1;9:963393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.963393.
[90]McKernan K. Pfizer and Moderna bivalent vaccines contain 20-35% expression vector and are transformation competent in E. coli. 2023.
.
[91]McKernan K (Medicinal Genomics, US), Nitta T (Tokyo Univ, Japan), Buckhaults PJ (University of South Carolina, US), Koenig B and Kirchner JO (MMD Indep Lab, Magdeburg, Germany), Speicher DJ (University of Guelph, Canada) and McKernan K (Medicinal Genomics, US), Hospital of Worzburg, Germany), Wang TJ, Kim A and Kim K, (FDA scientists, Centreville High School, US, executed at FDA White Oak Campus). Results in: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gJj3GSrM-UJR9c6Lrcn1k8-buQkQznuUVSKMR8-2lU/edit? gid 0-- igd-- 0.
[92]Speicher DJ. Full Detailed Report. 2024 Sept. 9. https://russellbroadbent.com.au/wp-content/uploads/David-Speicher-Report-2.pdf.
(93) K-mmerer U, Schulz V, Steger K. BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts of Residual DNA including an SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence. Public Health Policy Law. 2024 Mar 12. https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/biontech-rna-based-covid-19-injections-contain-large-amounts-of-residual-dna-under-sv40-promoter-enhancer-sequence/.
[94]Wang TJ, Kim A, Kim K. A rapid detection method of replication-competent plasmid DNA from COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for quality control. J High School Sc. 2024;8(4):427-39. https://jhss.scholasticahq.com/article/127890-a-rapid-detection-method-of-replication-competent-plasmid-dna-from-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-for-quality-control.
[95. Pekov S. Quantitative Multiplex Real-Time PCR analysis of Moderna (Spikevax) and Pfizer (BNT162b2) vaccines. 2025 Mar 8. https://www.10letters.org/CzechResearch.pdf.
[96]Dean DA, Dean BS, Muller S, Smith LC. Sequence requirements for plasmid nuclear import. Exp Cell Res. 1999 Dec 15;253(2):713-22. https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1999.4716.
[97]Duncan CN, Bledsoe JR, Grzywacz B, Beckman A, Bonner M, Eichler FS, et al. Hematologic cancer after gene therapy for cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 10;391(14):1287-1301. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2405541. See our article: https://lepointcritique.en/2024/10/14/new-proof-inedite-cancerogenicitis-injections-anti-covid-pfizer/.
[98]Hickey TE, Mudunuri U, Hempel HA, Kemp TJ, Roche NV, Talsania K, et al. Proteomic and serologic assessments of responses to mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccines in human recipient will be. Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 27;15:1502458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1502458.
[99]OpenVaet, Syed KA, Guetzkow J, Cobalt J, Kunadhasan J, Jackson B. Pfizer/BioNTech C4591001 Trial – Audit Report – v1 (2024-05-31) Reanalysis of the data and anomalies inventoried. 2024 May 31. https://openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbiontech-c4591001-trialaudit? open-false-%C2%A7evidence-the-planned-comparison-of-processes-and-was-never-conducted.
[100]Fajloun, Sabatier JM. The unsuspected role of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS): Could its dysregulation be at the root of all non-genetic human diseases? Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2024;24(1):e140923221085. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871526524666230914114524.
[101]Hazan S, Dave S, Barrows B, Borody T. Messenger RNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines affect the gut microbiome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct;117(10S):e162. https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0000857548.07509.09.
[102]Beaudoin CA, Bartas M, Volna A, Peinka P, Blundell TL. Are There Hidden Genes in DNA/RNA Vaccines? Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 8;13:801915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.801915.
[103]Beyond the failure of the anti-COVID injections, which have been approved on the conviction of laboratories that they could “probate abdicate new pandemic waves and thus considerably reduce mortality due to the disease” (page 14 of the evaluation report of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine/BioNTech), the geneticist Alexandra Henrion Caude reports that in the space of 20 years, 84). See the presentation of his book to the European Parliament on 18 April 2023: https://www.youtube.com/watch? v6HH5IyccJNk.
If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation.
Thank you to all the brave doctors & scientists and all the people of the world with curiosity, integrity, and strength of character who have risked so much to get this info out into the world.
The mRNA shots were/are always going to be an immunological catastrophe for humanity.
The mechanism of action (using mRNA instructions to turn one’s own cells into foreign non-self “spike protein factories”) is the primary mechanism of harm.
The primary danger of the COVID-19 mRNA injections has always been one’s own immune system’s attack response by the mighty CD8+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte cells (AKA Killer T-cells):
The COVID-19 mRNA injections must be recalled from the market and mRNA-based products must be banned because the modified mRNA-LNP genetic technology platform is fundamentally flawed & dangerous by design.
These modified mRNA-LNP COVID-19 injections, that trigger one's own immune system to attack & kill one's own formerly healthy cells (that have been instructed to produce/express foreign, non-self proteins), no matter where those cells are in the body, never should have been made available to the public in the first place.
When the (designed to be long-lasting) n1-methyl pseudouridine modified mRNA transfects one's cells, and gives instructions for the ribosomes to make & express foreign non-self proteins (such as the toxic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein), one's immune system sends the CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) to kill those formerly healthy cells that are now making & expressing non-self proteins.
It is the mission of these CD8+ CTLs to seek out and destroy any such transfected cell that is making foreign non-self proteins. That’s what they do…
Due to the biodistribution properties of the lipid nanoparticles, the encased modified mRNA can go anywhere in the body, including crossing the blood-brain and placental barriers...The LNP "delivery vehicles" traveled to different parts of the body in different people.
Expressing any foreign protein is fatal to the cell doing the expressing. The reason is, our bodies are protected by being able to distinguish ourselves from things that shouldn't be there. Anything non-self will trigger immune destruction of the cells & tissues involved.
Some people will express lots of foreign proteins in vulnerable locations. Others express less in less vulnerable areas.
The location of expression defines the adverse event: if you get foreign protein expression in your heart cells, you could get myocarditis & experience cardiac arrest; if the expression is in your brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nervous system, you could get one or more of a variety of neurological conditions; if in your eye, possible blindness; if in your ovaries, possible infertility; if in the placenta, possible miscarriage, stillbirth, or birth defects; if in the endothelial cells that line your blood vessels, possible vascular &/or microvascular injuries like clots/microclots or the long white fibrous clots, leading to strokes, heart attacks, or pulmonary embolisms…
If the expression of foreign proteins is in your own immune cells, you could experience immune dysfunction, dysregulation, & suppression including repeated infections, immune tolerance of a pathogenic foreign protein due to antibody subclass switch to IgG4 & increased IgG4-related diseases, T cell exhaustion, interference with & suppression of innate immunity, persistent systemic inflammation, dysregulation of toll-like receptors and reduced cancer surveillance or the suppression of tumor-suppressing immune system activities & cell-signaling (increasing your risk of fast-growing and aggressive cancers)…
And more…
There's no limit to the horrible consequences of injecting into your body something that triggers your own immune system to attack & kill your own formerly healthy cells & tissues.
The public “health” agencies, the COVID “authorities”, & the “mainstream” media fraudulently marketed these experimental mRNA gene “therapy” products as “safe & effective vaccines”. Trusting people thought that they were being presented with the choice (or the mandate) as to whether or not to take a “safe & effective vaccine”…But that was/is a deceptively false “choice”…
The COVID-19 mRNA injections are NOT safe, they are NOT effective, and they are NOT vaccines.
These modified mRNA-LNP gene “therapy” injections never would have passed proper safety studies required for gene therapy products. Safety studies (including biodistribution, immunogenicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, shedding, long-term effects, & more) that were bypassed because of the fraudulent mislabeling as “vaccines”. (And because of the EUA & “countermeasure” designations under the Project BioShield Act & PREP Act).
NO ONE should have ever had the “choice” of taking these gene “therapy” injections because the modified mRNA-LNP genetic technology platform is fundamentally flawed & dangerous by design.
The danger is NOT limited to just getting more COVID “boosters”. ANY mRNA gene “therapy” product that transfects your cells and instructs those cells to produce foreign non-self proteins (ANY non-self protein) will trigger an immune system attack response against your own cells & tissues (the role of the Killer T-cells is to monitor ALL the cells of the body, ready to destroy/kill any that express foreign, non-self proteins). This makes EVERY mRNA-based injected product harmful by design.
No one who took these modified mRNA-LNP COVID injections made an informed decision. Most people had no clue about what they allowed to be injected into their bodies...
Also most people still do not understand that the devastating harms inflicted upon people over the last few years was intentional:
https://rumble.com/v6qcb0y-dr.-david-martin-mar-06-2025-edmonton-alberta-replay.html
As one of Mark Crispin Millers “Died Suddenly “ researchers , the phrase “brief illness” is now very common within a multitude of obituaries. My experience, where secondary corroboration is available, usually is code for “turbo cancer”. Anecdotal stories abound about younger and younger people who develop absurd types of cancer. Unfortunately this exhaustive compilation of factual evidence will only be appreciated by the unvaccinated.